MOLEKULYAR DINAMIKA SIMULYATSIYASI YORDAMIDA SPC, TIP3P, TIP4P VA TIP5P SUV MODELLARINING SIFAT ANALIZI

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Sep 23, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 1 No. 4 (2022): Journal of Integrated Education and Research

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Mukhammadali Niyozaliev
O‘zbekiston Milliy Universiteti, Fizika fakulteti 4- kurs bakalavri imronbek7302@gmail.com
Jakhongir Matyakubov
O‘zbekiston Milliy Universiteti, Fizika fakulteti 4- kurs bakalavri.
Javokhir Xursandov
O‘zbekiston Milliy Universiteti, Fizika fakulteti 3- kurs bakalavri
Akbar Kodirov
Fanlar Akademiyasi Materialshunoslik Instituti, kichik ilmiy hodim
Jamoliddin Razzokov
O‘zbekiston Milliy Universiteti, Fizika fakulteti dotsenti, Fanlar Akademiyasi Materialshunoslik Instituti, katta ilmiy hodim

Abstract

Bioorganik molekulalarni o’z ichiga olgan model sistemalarda eritma sifatida asosan suvdan foydalaniladi. Hujayralarda ro’y beradigan biofizikaviy va biokimyoviy jarayonlarni o’rganishda suv modelini to’g’ri tanlash muhim bosqich hisoblanadi. Molekulyar dinamika yordamida turli xil temperaturalarda suv modellaridan o’zgarmas bosim (NPT) sharoitida zichlik bilan dielektik singdiruvchanligini tadqiq qildik. Biz SPC, TIP3P, TIP4P va TIP5P suv modellarini tanladik, ular geometriyasi va atom zaryadlarining boshqa parametrlari, shu jumladan kuch maydoni potentsiallari bilan farq qiladi. Suv modellari orasida TIP5P zichligi fazaviy o’tishni ham to’g’ri tasvirlab tajriba natijalariga yaqin ekanligi aniqlandi. Bundan farqli o'laroq, SPC modelining elektrostatik xarakteristikasi tajriba natijalariga o'xshashligi baholandi. Shuning uchun SPC va TIP5P suv modellaridan foydalanib turli xil obyektlarni tadqiq qilib yuqori aniqlikdagi natijalarni qo’lga kiritish mumkin.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Niyozaliev, M., Matyakubov , J., Xursandov, J., Kodirov, A., & Razzokov, J. (2022). MOLEKULYAR DINAMIKA SIMULYATSIYASI YORDAMIDA SPC, TIP3P, TIP4P VA TIP5P SUV MODELLARINING SIFAT ANALIZI. Journal of Integrated Education and Research, 1(4), 90–97. Retrieved from https://ojs.rmasav.com/index.php/ojs/article/view/229

References

  1. Neilson, G., Neutron diffraction studies of aqueous electrolyte solutions. Water and aqueous solutions. Adam Hilger, Bristol Boston, 1986: p. 169.
  2. Corongiu, G. and E. Clementi, Liquid water with an ab initio potential: X‐ray and neutron scattering from 238 to 368 K. The Journal of chemical physics, 1992. 97(3): p. 2030-2038.
  3. Narten, A. and H. Levy, Liquid water: Molecular correlation functions from x‐ray diffraction. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 1971. 55(5): p. 2263-2269.
  4. Neilson, G. and J. Enderby, Aqueous solutions and neutron scattering. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1996. 100(4): p. 1317-1322. Condensed Matter, 1996. 8(47): p. 9263.
  5. Jorgensen, W.L., et al., Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. The Journal of chemical physics, 1983. 79(2): p. 926-935.
  6. Dang, L.X., Importance of polarization effects in modeling the hydrogen bond in water using classical molecular dynamics techniques. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 1998. 102(3): p. 620-624.
  7. Ryckaert, J.-P., G. Ciccotti, and H.J. Berendsen, Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. Journal of computational physics, 1977. 23(3): p. 327-341.
  8. Mark, P. and L.J.T.J.o.P.C.A. Nilsson, Structure and dynamics of the TIP3P, SPC, and SPC/E water models at 298 K. 2001. 105(43): p. 9954-9960.
  9. Nutt, D.R., J.C.J.J.o.c.t. Smith, and computation, Molecular dynamics simulations of proteins: Can the explicit water model be varied? 2007. 3(4): p. 1550-1560.
  10. Henriques, J., M.J.J.o.c.t. Skepö, and computation, Molecular dynamics simulations of intrinsically disordered proteins: on the accuracy of the TIP4P-D water model and the representativeness of protein disorder models. 2016. 12(7): p. 3407-3415.
  11. Song, Y. and L.L.J.M.S. Dai, The shear viscosities of common water models by non-equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations. 2010. 36(7-8): p. 560-567.
  12. Sagui, C. and T.A. Darden, Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules: long-range electrostatic effects. Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure, 1999. 28(1): p. 155-179.
  13. Gunsteren, W.v. and H. Berendsen, Computer simulation of molecular dynamics: methodology, applications, and perspectives in chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl, 1990. 29(9): p. 992-1023.
  14. Jorgensen, W.L. and C.J.J.o.c.c. Jenson, Temperature dependence of TIP3P, SPC, and TIP4P water from NPT Monte Carlo simulations: Seeking temperatures of maximum density. 1998. 19(10): p. 1179-1186.
  15. Allen, M.P. and D.J. Tildesley, Computer simulation of liquids. 2017: Oxford university press.
  16. Abraham, M.J., et al., GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. 2015. 1: p. 19-25.
  17. Meza, A. and W. Szatzschneider, ECIR Model Application on Mexican Treasury Certificates (CETES) Through the Steepest Descent Algorithm.
  18. Bussi, G., D. Donadio, and M.J.T.J.o.c.p. Parrinello, Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. 2007. 126(1): p. 014101.
  19. Parrinello, M. and A.J.J.o.A.p. Rahman, Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method. 1981. 52(12): p. 7182-7190.
  20. Essmann, U., et al., A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. 1995. 103(19): p. 8577-8593.
  21. Srinivasa, S., & Singh, M. H. (2005). GRACE: A graph database system. COMAD 2005b, Hyderabad, India, 20-22.