MORFOTAKTIKA QOIDALARINING ZAMONAVIY LINGVISTIK MODELLARI

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Sep 30, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 2 No. 9 (2023): Journal of Integrated Education and Research

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Berdiyeva Habiba Abdumannon qizi
Farg‘ona viloyati Farg‘ona shahar 6- maktab “O‘zbek tili” o‘qituvchisi habibahoshimovaa@gmail.com

Abstract

Ushbu maqolada bugungi kunda yanada taraqqiy etib kelayotgan kompyuter lingvistikasi yo’nalishi hamda uning o‘ziga xos lingvistik modellaridan foydalanilgan holda morfotaktika qoidalarining aks etishi borasida fikr yuritiladi. Qayd etib o‘tish joizki, tovush o‘zgarishlarining zamonaviy lingvistik modellari tovush o‘zgarishlarining ma’lum xususiyatlariga tayangan holda yuzaga keladi. Bundan tashqari, ularning kompyuter modellarini aniqlash ushbu yo‘nalishning yanada taraqqiy etishiga yordam beradi.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Berdiyeva Habiba Abdumannon qizi. (2023). MORFOTAKTIKA QOIDALARINING ZAMONAVIY LINGVISTIK MODELLARI. Journal of Integrated Education and Research, 2(9), 104–107. Retrieved from https://ojs.rmasav.com/index.php/ojs/article/view/1304

References

  1. Anttila 1972 — R. Anttila. An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics. Macmillan, New York. Barnes 1999
  2. J. Barnes. Tucano. In: The Amazonian languages. Ed by. R. Dixon & A. Aikhenvald. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 207–226.
  3. Baxter et al. 2006 — G. Baxter, R. Blythe, W. Croft, A. McKane. Utterance selection model of language change. Physical Review E 73, pp. 046118–1 — 046118–20.
  4. Bermúdez-Otero 2007 — R. Bermúdez-Otero. Diachronic phonology. The Cambridge handbook of phonology. Ed by. P. de Lacy. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 497–517.
  5. Beuchat & Rivet 1911 — H. Beuchat, P. Rivet. La famille Betoya ou tucano. Memoir de la Societé Linguistique de Paris 17, pp. 117–36. Blevins 2004 — J. Blevins.
  6. Evolutionary phonology. The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Bouchard-Côté et al. 2013
  7. A. Bochard-Côté, D. Hall, T. Griffiths, D. Klein. Automated reconstruction of ancient languages using probabilistic models of sound change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110.11, pp. 4224–4229.
  8. Brinton 1891 — D. Brinton. The American race. A linguistic classification and ethnographic description of the native tribes of North and South America. N. D. C. Hodges, New York. Brown et al. 2013
  9. C.Brown, E. Holman, S. Wichmann. Sound correspondences in the world’s languages. Language 89.1, pp. 4–29. Brugmann 1967
  10. K.Brugmann. Einleitung und Lautlehre: vergleichende Laut, Stammbildungs- und Flexionslehre der indogermanischen Sprachen. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, Leipzig. Bryant 2001
  11. H.Bryant. Character polarity and the rooting of cladograms. The character concept in evolutionary biology. Ed by. G. Wagner. Academic Press, San Diego, London, pp. 319–342. Camin & Sokal 1965
  12. J.Camin, R. Sokal. A method for deducing branching sequences in phylogeny. Evolution 19.3, pp. 311–327. Campbell 1999
  13. L.Campbell. Historical linguistics. An introduction. Edinburgh Univ. Press, Edinburgh. Chacon 2013
  14. T.Chacon. Kubeo: Linguistic and cultural interactions in the Upper Rio Negro. In: Upper Rio Negro: Cultural and Linguistic Interaction in Northwestern Amazonia. Ed by. P. Epps & K. Stenzel. Museu Nacional and Museu do Índio Funai, Rio de Janeiro, pp. 403–443.